ChatGPT offers medium-length answers

[samiaseo55]

DeepSeek generates significantly longer responses, averaging 391 words, which is indicative of its effort to provide comprehensive and detailed coverage of a given topic. Another characteristic of DeepSeek is its abundant citation of sources . It cites an average of 28 sources per response, indicating that it seeks to draw on a wide range of information.

This approach can be beneficial for users who are looking for more complex information and want to learn about different perspectives on a given issue. On the other hand, overly long and detailed architect data answers can be overwhelming for some users and can make it difficult to find key information.

Subjectivity analysis
The subjectivity analysis provides an interesting comparison of how individual AI platforms approach providing information. The results show that ChatGPT appears to be the most objective, with the lowest subjectivity score (0.393). This means that its answers tend to be factual rather than opinionated. Google AI Overviews came in second (0.427), suggesting that it too strives for relative objectivity, albeit with a slightly higher level of subjectivity than ChatGPT.

At the opposite end of the spectrum is DeepSeek , which shows the highest level of subjectivity (0.446). This means that its answers tend to contain more opinions and interpretations. These differences are particularly noticeable on political topics, where DeepSeek scored 0.497, indicating a strongly opinionated approach. In contrast, Google scored 0.246 in this area, indicating a strongly factual and substantive approach.